Perchè CDC traccheggia?

 

(𝘙𝘦𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴, 13 𝘰𝘵𝘵𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘦) - 𝘐 𝘊𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘪 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘪 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘰 𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘦, 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯 𝘶𝘯'𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘭 𝘍𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘰𝘮 𝘰𝘧 𝘐𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘈𝘤𝘵 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘷𝘢 𝘥𝘪 𝘰𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘷𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘥𝘪 𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘪 𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘻𝘻𝘢 𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘨𝘭𝘪 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘪 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪 𝘥𝘦𝘪 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘪 𝘊𝘖𝘝𝘐𝘋-19, 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘰 𝘶𝘯 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘨𝘯𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘨𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘰.

𝘕𝘦𝘪 𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪 𝘥𝘦𝘭 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘦, 𝘭'𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘪𝘢 𝘩𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰 𝘪𝘭 30 𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘷𝘳𝘦𝘣𝘣𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘶𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘰 𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘦𝘣 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘦 𝘥𝘪 𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘪 "𝘥𝘪 𝘶𝘴𝘰 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘰" 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪 𝘥𝘢 𝘤𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘢 10 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘪 𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘰 𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘮𝘢 "𝘷-𝘴𝘢𝘧𝘦", 𝘶𝘯 𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘢 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘶 𝘴𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘱𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘪𝘢 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘨𝘨𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘨𝘨𝘪 𝘴𝘶𝘭 𝘸𝘦𝘣 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘪 𝘱𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘪 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘪 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪 𝘥𝘦𝘪 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘪 𝘊𝘖𝘝𝘐𝘋-19 𝘥𝘪 𝘗𝘧𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘳, 𝘔𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢 𝘦 𝘑𝘰𝘩𝘯𝘴𝘰𝘯 & 𝘑𝘰𝘩𝘯𝘴𝘰𝘯. 𝘔𝘢 𝘪𝘭 𝘊𝘋𝘊 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘩𝘢 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘢. 𝘜𝘯 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘤𝘦 𝘩𝘢 𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘯 𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘰 𝘯𝘦𝘪 "𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪 𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘪 𝘦 𝘢𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘪" 𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘪 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘭𝘢 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘭 𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘦𝘣 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭'𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘪𝘢, 𝘮𝘢 𝘩𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘢 𝘥𝘪 𝘱𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰 𝘭𝘢 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘪 𝘯𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘦 𝘰 𝘭'𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘦. 𝘕𝘦𝘭 𝘧𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘰, 𝘪𝘭 𝘊𝘋𝘊 𝘩𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘪 𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘪 𝘷-𝘴𝘢𝘧𝘦 (𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘢 𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘦) 𝘢𝘭 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘢 𝘍𝘖𝘐𝘈, 𝘭'𝘐𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘥 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘈𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘕𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬, 𝘰 𝘐𝘊𝘈𝘕, 𝘶𝘯'𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘻𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘯𝘰-𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘥𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘛𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢 𝘥𝘪 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘪 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘢 "𝘤𝘰𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢" 𝘢 𝘧𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘦𝘭𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪. 𝘓'𝘐𝘊𝘈𝘕 𝘩𝘢 𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘪 𝘯𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘰 𝘦 𝘩𝘢 𝘰𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘶𝘯𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦, 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘪𝘭 𝘴𝘶𝘰 𝘢𝘷𝘷𝘰𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘰, 𝘴𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘰 𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘦 "𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪". 𝘚𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘐𝘊𝘈𝘕, 𝘪𝘭 7,7% 𝘥𝘦𝘨𝘭𝘪 𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘷-𝘴𝘢𝘧𝘦 - 782.913 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘦 - 𝘩𝘢 𝘳𝘪𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘢 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰 𝘶𝘯 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘢, 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘥𝘪 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘢 𝘶𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦, 𝘶𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘰 𝘰 𝘶𝘯 𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘶𝘯 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘰 𝘊𝘖𝘝𝘐𝘋-19. 𝘊𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘢 𝘪𝘭 25% 𝘥𝘦𝘨𝘭𝘪 𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘷-𝘴𝘢𝘧𝘦 𝘩𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘮𝘪 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘭𝘪 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰 𝘧𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘰𝘭𝘢 𝘰 𝘪𝘭 𝘭𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘳𝘰 𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘭𝘪 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘴𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘪, 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘪𝘭 " 𝘥𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘦𝘳" 𝘥𝘪 𝘐𝘊𝘈𝘕 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘶𝘮𝘦 𝘪 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪.

𝘛𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘢, 𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘵𝘦, 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘦̀ 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘦 𝘪 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘪 𝘊𝘖𝘝𝘐𝘋-19 𝘢𝘣𝘣𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘰 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘪 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘣𝘪. 𝘓'𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘐𝘊𝘈𝘕 𝘩𝘢 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘰 𝘭𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘭𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘪 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪 𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦 𝘨𝘪𝘰𝘳𝘯𝘪 𝘥𝘰𝘱𝘰 𝘪𝘭 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘰 𝘦 𝘩𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘦 𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰 𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘢 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘰 𝘢 𝘶𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘱𝘰 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘷𝘶𝘵𝘰 𝘭'𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘦𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦. 𝘐𝘊𝘈𝘕 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘩𝘢 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰 𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘷𝘶𝘵𝘰 𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘱𝘰 𝘭𝘢 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦, 𝘯𝘦́ 𝘪 𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘪 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘰 𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦. 𝘏𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘶𝘯 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘤𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭 𝘊𝘋𝘊 𝘤𝘰𝘴𝘢 𝘯𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘢 𝘭'𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘪 𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘐𝘊𝘈𝘕. 𝘐 𝘯𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪 𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘰 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪? 𝘐𝘭 𝘊𝘋𝘊 "𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘶𝘰̀ 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘪 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘵𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘪 𝘧𝘶𝘰𝘳𝘪 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭'𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘪𝘢 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘣𝘣𝘪𝘢𝘮𝘰 𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰", 𝘩𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘭 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘤𝘦 𝘷𝘪𝘢 𝘦-𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘭, 𝘮𝘢 𝘩𝘢 𝘢𝘨𝘨𝘪𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘪 𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘷-𝘴𝘢𝘧𝘦 "𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪 𝘵𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘢 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘥𝘰𝘱𝘰 𝘭𝘢 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦, 𝘪𝘯 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘭'𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘻𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦".

𝘕𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘢 𝘥𝘰𝘱𝘰 𝘭𝘢 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦, 𝘩𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘭𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘤𝘦, "𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘰 𝘢 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦 (𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪 𝘨𝘭𝘪 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘢) 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘰 𝘥𝘢𝘭𝘭'1 𝘢𝘭 3% (𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘭 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘰, 𝘥𝘦𝘭 𝘨𝘳𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘦𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘥𝘰𝘴𝘦)".

Da parte mia due domande:

- perchè CDC non pubblica i dati che un tribunale aveva imposto di fare entro il 30 settembre e tergiversa?

- perchè CDC tenta di cavarsela affermando che nella prima settimana dopo la vaccinazione le segnalazioni di ricorso a cure mediche variano dall'1 al 3% quando tutti noi sappiamo che gli eventi avversi gravi (artrite, trombocitopenia, sindrome di Guillain-Barrè, miocarditi ecc. ecc.) si manifestano assai più tardi nel tempo?

 

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/new-data-is-out-covid-vaccine-injury-claims-whats-make-it-2022-10-12/